Many thanks for having a listen to my track and for your comments, much appreciated. With regard to the true peak value, you're correct that it's a lot lower than you might usually expect. The "smoothness" too is due in part to this and the process I undertook to satisfy the -14 LUFS requirement of the competition. I'll try and explain what I did...A Future in Noise wrote: ↑Tue Sep 26, 2023 18:50 CESTVery kind of you to comment on my submission, even though I'm not entering the contest this month. As for Above the Clouds, my first impression is that it is a very well mixed song. But maybe too long for being a song without a bridge or other things that stand out. Admittedly, there is a part between 2:48 – 3:52 that is instrumental. But as I judge it, without having analyzed meticulously, the chord progression behind is exactly the same here. Also: aside from what I said about "well-mixed", I thought the overall impression is that everything is a little too smooth. Part of that is due, I guess, to the super-smooth synthetic vocals. But also the super hard compression. I imported your wav.file into REAPER, to be able to listen with extra EQ with my earbuds, which I carry with me when I'm not at home. When I saw the graph on the display of my laptop, it occurred to me that the lack of roughness may be due to the fact that the truepeak never exceeds -5 dB. I will try to attach a screenshot of that graph. Then I will return, when/if time permits, with further observations.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I can't really see why you wanted to compress like this (and I haven't checked iLUFS, but still a good song! Keep up the good work.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bQKgDs ... sp=sharing
I usually still master things to a typical CD loudness level, so I initially had my mastering limiter set quite agressively and had to relax the threshold a large amount to attain the required competition specs. However, after listening back to the first master bounce I didn't like the way all the reverb and effects that had been previously been compressed and brought up had suddenly dropped down quite significantly. Admittedly the transients were more audible and things were generally a bit crisper, but I much preferred the intensly limited sound as the choruses in particular had an enhanced stereo thickness from everything being squeezed. Therefore what I did in the end was bounce the master at full squash then reduce the level of the bounced file so it was within spec (a reduction of around -7.5dB was required). This is why the true peak is a lot lower than expected, since the material has already been heavily limited. Ultimately though it was all in pursuit of what (to my funny ears at least) was a more pleasing sound in this case.
Sorry, yes of course, I should've appreciated that English isn't your first language!A Future in Noise wrote: ↑Tue Sep 26, 2023 20:15 CESTUn-cryptisize activities is a crusial thing when it comes to interpret lyrics, I believe. But I cannot judge my own talent as a writer, of course. I hesitated about the line " ... rid of ancient affairs ..." before I posted. I wish I had found a better way to express it, but I didn't. English isn't my native language, but everybody is so used to hear that language accompany contemporary music.