Re: MIX CHALLENGE - MC057 August 2019 - Mix Round 1 in evaluation
Posted: Sat Aug 24, 2019 21:54 CEST
@mork,
it might be interesting to consider about the reward-givers, those plugin makers. else a competition might become moot.
are they interested in comments?
I am using only plugins, that I got for free, to make a point for the beginners.
special cases are Little Plate and Subspace (did I forget another one?) as they have commercial big brothers, and were offered for free only during a limited time.
So, if someone says, I got my preferred organ sound with Waves (whatever), it might be an interesting point to the vendors.
Or, what technique is recommended in case depth lacks? or, balance and intensity of certain stems, someone might jump in and claim that e.g. Gullfoss does the job.
OTOH, I think the music industry is interested mainly in commercial schools and their contests, like "produce like a pro".
and they gave away for free quite a lot already.
about the perfection and style, there is this meme with "dark side of the moon", I call it meme because everyone has the rainbow picture somewhere in the mix room or online exhibition.
I have a different example.
"Jesus Christ Superstar", the studio album has utter perfection, and the movie soundtrack is completely different, almost a "culture shock". the latter is all about attitude.
or, the different renditions of "Hair", that probably had quite an influence on some later Soul and RnB mainstream productions, as it builds a bridge among audiences.
so, I think the highly popular live bootleg uploads on YT reflect the idea of the JCS movie sound. if the FOH sound was focused enough, the smartphone can capture everything that is important. on that playground, I love many Japanese uploads, but also some Russian. they are living this rock band attitude, not as white-headed seniors, but in the millennial generation and younger.
---
but while you are online and replying, I think your mix transmits some calmness, while mine may be a bit aggressive.
it's another of my top 5.
what I like:
I like the tremolo effect on the piano, and that it has a clear position in the space (not swirling around like some chorus processors did).
the bass is very warm, don't know if it is not overwhelming in the car though.
solo git sound, and the delay effect. also, not too aggressive. rh.git and mod effects are sweet.
balance and distinction between snare sound and rim shot is very nice. snare sounds _not_ plastic, but has enough treble to shine and support the vocal groove.
kick is very soft and organic, but does it get drowned on poor listening devices? (having not that much treble)
I love the vocal sound in the verse. the chorus is a bit loud, while I made it more "breathy" instead.
strings jump in well, so the loud vocal in the chorus seems no problem.
possible issues:
the organ is clashing with the guitar solo, some lower midrange. making the guitar loud does not help that. (organ is good in the vocal finale.)
tomtom sound before the git solo is a bit on the thin or boxy side. also during the solo, toms have some dynamic strangeness, with that I experimented myself also.
vocals seem a bit dry, which I love only in the first verse.
check out the difference between our renders, in the word "(come back and) STAY", I love the drama, and made it a bit more like "stay-eeh" because it had this potential in the first place. so, about vocal editing or compression, I'm following Mr.Warren Huart in these matters, he has intense lessions online and free. I also second his credo, that sound perfection is not the goal, but impact is, and something has to be "wrong" to create the best energy in the song.
it might be interesting to consider about the reward-givers, those plugin makers. else a competition might become moot.
are they interested in comments?
I am using only plugins, that I got for free, to make a point for the beginners.
special cases are Little Plate and Subspace (did I forget another one?) as they have commercial big brothers, and were offered for free only during a limited time.
So, if someone says, I got my preferred organ sound with Waves (whatever), it might be an interesting point to the vendors.
Or, what technique is recommended in case depth lacks? or, balance and intensity of certain stems, someone might jump in and claim that e.g. Gullfoss does the job.
OTOH, I think the music industry is interested mainly in commercial schools and their contests, like "produce like a pro".
and they gave away for free quite a lot already.
about the perfection and style, there is this meme with "dark side of the moon", I call it meme because everyone has the rainbow picture somewhere in the mix room or online exhibition.
I have a different example.
"Jesus Christ Superstar", the studio album has utter perfection, and the movie soundtrack is completely different, almost a "culture shock". the latter is all about attitude.
or, the different renditions of "Hair", that probably had quite an influence on some later Soul and RnB mainstream productions, as it builds a bridge among audiences.
so, I think the highly popular live bootleg uploads on YT reflect the idea of the JCS movie sound. if the FOH sound was focused enough, the smartphone can capture everything that is important. on that playground, I love many Japanese uploads, but also some Russian. they are living this rock band attitude, not as white-headed seniors, but in the millennial generation and younger.
---
but while you are online and replying, I think your mix transmits some calmness, while mine may be a bit aggressive.
it's another of my top 5.
what I like:
I like the tremolo effect on the piano, and that it has a clear position in the space (not swirling around like some chorus processors did).
the bass is very warm, don't know if it is not overwhelming in the car though.
solo git sound, and the delay effect. also, not too aggressive. rh.git and mod effects are sweet.
balance and distinction between snare sound and rim shot is very nice. snare sounds _not_ plastic, but has enough treble to shine and support the vocal groove.
kick is very soft and organic, but does it get drowned on poor listening devices? (having not that much treble)
I love the vocal sound in the verse. the chorus is a bit loud, while I made it more "breathy" instead.
strings jump in well, so the loud vocal in the chorus seems no problem.
possible issues:
the organ is clashing with the guitar solo, some lower midrange. making the guitar loud does not help that. (organ is good in the vocal finale.)
tomtom sound before the git solo is a bit on the thin or boxy side. also during the solo, toms have some dynamic strangeness, with that I experimented myself also.
vocals seem a bit dry, which I love only in the first verse.
check out the difference between our renders, in the word "(come back and) STAY", I love the drama, and made it a bit more like "stay-eeh" because it had this potential in the first place. so, about vocal editing or compression, I'm following Mr.Warren Huart in these matters, he has intense lessions online and free. I also second his credo, that sound perfection is not the goal, but impact is, and something has to be "wrong" to create the best energy in the song.