Re: SONGWRITING COMPETITION - SWC07 March 2018 - Voting until 01-04-2018 11:59pm GMT+2/CEST
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2018 21:11 CEST
Community Forum
https://mix-challenge.com/forum/
Well, as I said before the only reason my critique focused more on the technical aspect was because it was the element that stood out to me the most, I also wanted to be as clear as possible about what I was talking about to not be confused with just disliking distortion in general.
Cheers, some good ideas to look at there. I'm thinking about that last section..the vocal is right at the top of my range (30 odd years of smoking tends to do that..Nige wrote: ↑Wed Mar 28, 2018 00:48 CEST
Donkeyt-Oncoming traffic
Not really getting too much of a 60's flavour tbh,it feels a bitmore modern to me with a of early Blur or even hints of Oasis, but either way a really concise, to the point track with equally memorable vocal melodies, I especially love how the change falls on the "traffic" part, really clever and engaging, and the call and return play off between the main vox and the BV's was a sweet touch too.
The syncopation of the drums, bass and vocals are a winning combo in my books, all three elements play off each other really succinctly, and you can tell there's tons of effort put into those drum and bass tracks, and they way you really highlighted the accents.
As far as the "jangle" goes, I would have like a more natural guitar sound and level overall in comparison to the strong bass/drum performance. They felt more like an ambient element as opposed to a driving force on top of the rhythm.
The "singing down a pipe"vocal effect wasn't working for me either, a more lo-fi approach might have been a better option but I guess it all comes down to taste.
I think the biggest let down for me was coming back into the final verse after the short interlude 1:43-1:57 and getting the same vocal delivery as at the start. Don't get me wrong, it wasn't horrible or anything, but a key change or even a variation in the melody of some description would have really knocked it out of the park, instead it felt a bit too samey for such a concise track.
A tight mix, and a really nice job overall.
Never neglect the importance of a strong ending (>insert every great song of the modern age here< .donkey tugger wrote: ↑Wed Mar 28, 2018 19:43 CEST
Cheers, some good ideas to look at there. I'm thinking about that last section..the vocal is right at the top of my range (30 odd years of smoking tends to do that..) so maybe something going lower I think. Hmm...I shall ponder.
And I'll always take Blur as any kind of comparison.![]()
FixInTheMix
Being compared to Spinetta is the best compliment one could possibly get so thank you!
Hey thanks for the feedback, you've raised some really valid points. I definitely get a bit lazy when it comes to vocals, probably because I don't really consider myself a singer, as opposed to having to do it out of necessity and tend to rush through the whole process.kc23 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 29, 2018 21:57 CEST
This one has a nice sort of simple structure, but with good "riffy" guitars very upfront and agresive (maybe a little too much in some moments). Those guitars sound really good! I like the "blend" I hear between old and new "Alices", as in your singing and the chorus reminds me of Alice Cooper, and the voice delays right before the 16th notes bridge and the key drop in the solo remind me a lot of Alice in Chains... hehe. What threw me off a little is the change to major feel on the final chorus... its not like its not nice... but I think it doesn´t sound as "sweet" to me as maybe you wanted it to be... maybe a modulation to another key in there?
On the production side, your doubled voices maybe need to be a little tighter rhythmic wise... I mean the ones that are in the same note, the harmonies are fine. And a little less guitar (talking about levels not sounds!) in favor of the voice in some spots... I still can´t figure out what are you saying at the beginning of the chorus... and I´ve already worn off my hard drive in that spot! hehe