Re: SONGWRITING COMPETITION - SWC072 August 2023 - Voting until 01-SEP-2023 23:59 UTC+2/CEST
Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2023 09:48 CEST
by A Future in Noise
Ranking:
Feedback:
What I learned this month:
All other info, previously delivered: https://mix-challenge.com/forum/viewtop ... 376#p15376
My entry (and I repeat this in order to not create more confusion) still is this one, which is identical to the one I posted before August 24th:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HevuRj ... p=drivesdk
► Show Spoiler
1. VCA-089
2. The Exponent
3. Arelem
4. Doc Jon
5. Havol
2. The Exponent
3. Arelem
4. Doc Jon
5. Havol
► Show Spoiler
VCA-089: I immediately associate the aggressiveness at the beginning with "upheaval". Your song contains so many good ingredients that I can't list them all here. There is variety, in any case: not too little and not too much. The song is not too simple and not too complicated.
The Exponent: The very melancholic synth voice at the beginning is not something I can associate with "upheaval" - nor the lyrics, because words are completely missing. At 02:35, however, the whole composition takes off, and here you can sense quite clearly that a revolution is in the air.
Arelem: Good craftsmanship, as always. But I would have liked to take part in a piece of lyrics that does not only consist of detached phrases, regardless of whether they are all easily associated with 'upheaval'.
Doc Jon: The first four, five seconds are very pleasant from a "sound" point of view; everything is perfectly balanced: synth(?)-bass, e-piano, drums, e-guitar. The synthetic male voice doesn't impress me too much, while the female voice is lovely.
Now I come to the lyrics: During the first listening session, I only perceived: "Hey kid, you're not alone, hey kid, pick up your phone..." which IMO is very banal. But the lyrics contain much more than that, so I realized that I was obliged to read the whole lyrics. And the judgment is that it is not at all wrong to present a sensitive and fragile subject in a slightly banal way - the message is probably conveyed better that way than through super-intellectual lyrics. But in any case, could you consider renting a real homo sapiens next time, who sings, if you don't want to sing yourself? It would be idiotic - of me or any other person - to aim to be as good as the young Elvis Presley. But if AI science really succeeds in this - then I will stop listening to music altogether.
My main objection is probably that the song is a little bit too long. It gets a bit repetitive towards the end and also the sound as a whole is a bit too smooth to be associated with 'upheaval'. (You can of course direct similar criticism towards my entry, but what can I do about that now?) P.S. Maybe you should have thrown in a bridge towards the end (because there isn't one - right?) although that trick is probably overused.
Havol: There is nothing wrong with your piano sound. Nor the guitar sound. But maybe you should try not to use only a kind of quite simple "figures" (rhythmic as well as in terms of melody), as you do, throughout. And what do I mean by "figure"? I have no idea how to translate that music technical term from Swedish to English, and such terms cannot be looked up in a dictionary either. I suppose you could describe a piece of a sine curve as a figure. A bit of a square wave too. Probably also a super-simplistic drawing made by Picasso. Does that make sense to you?
Anyway, I liked your song the first time I heard it. And sometimes that's the method I use when ranking the submissions in this contest: if I liked the entry the first time I listened (maybe walking on a sidewalk somewhere), the song ends up reasonably high on my list.
The Exponent: The very melancholic synth voice at the beginning is not something I can associate with "upheaval" - nor the lyrics, because words are completely missing. At 02:35, however, the whole composition takes off, and here you can sense quite clearly that a revolution is in the air.
Arelem: Good craftsmanship, as always. But I would have liked to take part in a piece of lyrics that does not only consist of detached phrases, regardless of whether they are all easily associated with 'upheaval'.
Doc Jon: The first four, five seconds are very pleasant from a "sound" point of view; everything is perfectly balanced: synth(?)-bass, e-piano, drums, e-guitar. The synthetic male voice doesn't impress me too much, while the female voice is lovely.
Now I come to the lyrics: During the first listening session, I only perceived: "Hey kid, you're not alone, hey kid, pick up your phone..." which IMO is very banal. But the lyrics contain much more than that, so I realized that I was obliged to read the whole lyrics. And the judgment is that it is not at all wrong to present a sensitive and fragile subject in a slightly banal way - the message is probably conveyed better that way than through super-intellectual lyrics. But in any case, could you consider renting a real homo sapiens next time, who sings, if you don't want to sing yourself? It would be idiotic - of me or any other person - to aim to be as good as the young Elvis Presley. But if AI science really succeeds in this - then I will stop listening to music altogether.
My main objection is probably that the song is a little bit too long. It gets a bit repetitive towards the end and also the sound as a whole is a bit too smooth to be associated with 'upheaval'. (You can of course direct similar criticism towards my entry, but what can I do about that now?) P.S. Maybe you should have thrown in a bridge towards the end (because there isn't one - right?) although that trick is probably overused.
Havol: There is nothing wrong with your piano sound. Nor the guitar sound. But maybe you should try not to use only a kind of quite simple "figures" (rhythmic as well as in terms of melody), as you do, throughout. And what do I mean by "figure"? I have no idea how to translate that music technical term from Swedish to English, and such terms cannot be looked up in a dictionary either. I suppose you could describe a piece of a sine curve as a figure. A bit of a square wave too. Probably also a super-simplistic drawing made by Picasso. Does that make sense to you?
Anyway, I liked your song the first time I heard it. And sometimes that's the method I use when ranking the submissions in this contest: if I liked the entry the first time I listened (maybe walking on a sidewalk somewhere), the song ends up reasonably high on my list.
► Show Spoiler
It seams to me I often associate in a much more free way than other people, when I see an image/a picture or a painting. But I knew that before. But as time goes by it also becomes more clear to me, that I write songs with focus on melodies rather than focus on what kind of sound is modern right now, and that the lyrics I write fits like a glove to the melody (in terms of syllables) and that rhyms I use, when I use rhyms, not only are approximate, but often precise.
My entry (and I repeat this in order to not create more confusion) still is this one, which is identical to the one I posted before August 24th:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HevuRj ... p=drivesdk