Page 10 of 16
Re: MIX CHALLENGE - MC051 February 2019 - Mix Round 1 in evaluation
Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2019 22:33 CET
by MixMad
Point taken ,apologies. Uploaded again with fliename change
https://www.dropbox.com/s/a0gco502tl9t5 ... V.wav?dl=0
Gary
Re: MIX CHALLENGE - MC051 February 2019 - Mix Round 1 in evaluation
Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2019 22:52 CET
by MOA22
Appreciate !
Re: MIX CHALLENGE - MC051 February 2019 - Mix Round 1 in evaluation
Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2019 22:53 CET
by MOA22

18 out of 71 reviews (have to be reschecked after...)
Re: MIX CHALLENGE - MC051 February 2019 - Mix Round 1 in evaluation
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2019 00:19 CET
by UprightJoe
Man, I feel for you. I've listened to at least half of the mixes and it's really brutal trying to keep your ears fresh. By about mix 6 or so, I can't tell what's up or down without taking a longish break and resetting with some references. I can't imagine grinding through all 71.
Re: MIX CHALLENGE - MC051 February 2019 - Mix Round 1 in evaluation
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2019 00:42 CET
by Henrik Hjortnaes
MOA22 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 23, 2019 22:53 CET

18 out of 71 reviews (have to be reschecked after...)
Oh man, that's a lot of work. Thanks for letting us see your process / setup. Just out of curiosity, are you using any LUFS matching tools like MCompare or MtM Reference?
Re: MIX CHALLENGE - MC051 February 2019 - Mix Round 1 in evaluation
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2019 01:21 CET
by MOA22
No, just every track has an instance of Youlean -> Fader move. Pretty fast.
Re: MIX CHALLENGE - MC051 February 2019 - Mix Round 1 in evaluation
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2019 01:32 CET
by MOA22
UprightJoe wrote: ↑Sun Feb 24, 2019 00:19 CET
Man, I feel for you. I've listened to at least half of the mixes and it's really brutal trying to keep your ears fresh. By about mix 6 or so, I can't tell what's up or down without taking a longish break and resetting with some references. I can't imagine grinding through all 71.
About 6-10 tracks a day yes ! So you've got to wait a bit. I am constantly referencing to my mix, it is not the best, but I need a starting point.
The markers are useful to compare small sections fast. My keyboard is only used for writing, the Faderport to switch between sections and tracks fast.
The only limit is my ears... Listening at a very low volume (my tiny Focal are good for that, no need to push it at all)
I am listening to my subwoofer only when needed, bc I have a footswitch on my desk

, doesn't smell bad because it has never touched the ground.
Re: MIX CHALLENGE - MC051 February 2019 - Mix Round 1 in evaluation
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2019 02:17 CET
by Waleed Morris
Changed the file name here too , good luck to you and to all participants .
Re: MIX CHALLENGE - MC051 February 2019 - Mix Round 1 in evaluation
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2019 06:01 CET
by Mister Fox
MOA22 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 23, 2019 22:53 CET

18 out of 71 reviews (have to be reschecked after...)
I do like the looks of this!
(EDIT: Also nice Focals, Faderport and UAD Apollo - just as a sidenote

)
Re: MIX CHALLENGE - MC051 February 2019 - Mix Round 1 in evaluation
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2019 06:07 CET
by Mister Fox
MOA22 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 23, 2019 20:50 CET
To download the files were a real P I T A.
PLEASE GUYS, EVEN IF YOU DON T WANT TO FOLLOW STRICTLY THE INSTRUCTIONS, PLEASE GIVE YOUR NAME TO THE FILES, NOT ONLY THE TITLE OF THE SONG. I KNOW IT PRETTY WELL ALREADY. AND PLEASE ONLY THE NAME OF YOUR MIX CHALLENGE ACCOUNT. DON’T HAVE A MINUTE TO WASTE TO CHECK WHO’S WHO !!!!! HORRIBLY PAINFULL.
Let me point out what has been written on every first post on page 1:
⚠ | Moderation Message from Mister Fox | |
- IMPORTANT: please use the following naming convention:
MC000_-_ArtistName_-_TrackName_-_ContestanttName.wav/mp3 and
MC000_-_ArtistName_-_TrackName_-_ContestanttName_R2.wav/mp3 for Mix Round 2.
|
I'm stating an official warning right now.
We have a lot of new participants. So you're having a free pass. But(!), if you've been with the Mix(ing) Challenge for longer than two months, and still don't stick to what's written in both of the rule set and on the two initial posts, you're risking a straight up disqualification.
We do have rules for a reason. So please stick to them!
