@TrojakEW I can see what you want to say, basically that the genre is too restrictive in style, and that being creative is incompatible with satisfying the SWC rules. I'm of the opinion that, when you are not a fan of a genre, you won't distinguish tracks and artists and they will all sound the same. It happens to me with genres I'm not used to, I feel you.
But still, every genre has its "rules", and of course if you change some of those, the genre will change. And I can see why the SWC has to be "restrictive" in that sense. In the end, you need to establish some baseline to evaluate from. In this case, an important characteristic of the genre is its speed - you just can't produce DnB with less than 165BPM (and even there, most of the material that slow is Jungle or experimental/minimal). Also, usually you have to take into account this music is mostly "designed" to be played on a club, or at least, on a mix, where it will have to interact (blend, get mixed) with other tracks in the genre, and that shapes the track structures (intros and outros to blend in and out, 8 and 16 bar basic blocks). It depends on how much you know and like the genre, that you see those things as restrictions to your creativity or just as the genre identity.
TBH, if your track does not follow the "genre rules", it's OK, you can be as creative as you want - but then, the track is not on that subgenre. That may interfere with the SWC rules, or with the opinion and votes of the participants. If you are submitting a prog rock track to a country challenge, yeah, they are both played with guitars and drums and bass, they may have a similar structure, but in the end, it's not country.
I don't want to say your material is bad, just, rules are rules.
, but well, I did it. Now, how does it sound without hitting -8 LUFS at the loudest parts of the tracks? That's something I wanna know...