Am I again the first one to give comments? That suits me fine. I prefer to be uninfluenced. It's easier to find one's own opinions and write them down when I have no clue what others will be saying.
I listened every song at least three times and everytime my opinions changed a bit. So if I listened these submissions more, I might give just opposite opinions.
But first, what I learned this month? The main thing is that I noticed that musical idea and sound are separate things. Or should it be thought the other way, musical idea is always dependent on the sound. I don't know. What I mean? I was fighting way too much to get the rhythm guitar right. (well, I never did.) I had clear ideas what I wanted to play. And then I played, and it sounded awful in the context. And as I tried different things, it happened that what sounded better was a stupid idea that I didn't want to use. And as I have several guitars both electric and acoustics with electric pickups, and I can record them with normal microphones or with their own pickups, or with combination of those two. But if the sound is fat (neck humbugger) or edgy (P90 bridge) or thin (hi-passed normal mic), or both full and bright, in each case the one and the same playing idea serves a totally different role in the mix or context of other instruments. And when I thought I had it right, the situation changed if I used drums with brushes or with the hard hit or decided to do a drumless song, etc. In the end, the most difficult part was the one that should have been the easiest. And funnily the easiest part was the solo guitars, which I had thought to be the hardest. But if one thinks, solo guitars role is fixed. Just play your thing and that's it. Other instruments will adapt to what solo instrument is doing. But rhythm guitars will have to adapt to everything else. And if the rhythm guitars role will be around 400 hz, one has to think the playing differently than in the case when guitars tone will abide around 5000 hz. And if you want to be smooth or edgy in the 5000 hz area, one must choose different musical idea. Funny that one must learn the basic things again and again.
Here's my highly subjective comments to each submission. I don't intend to be harsh, but I want to give real opinions. But my opinions change quickly, I'm ready to disagree with myself tomorrow.
===========
Elcubano: "Storm's Solace"
I do have to admit, that I don't know anything about heavy music and it's subgenres, so keep that in your mind while reading my comments.
This song starts with an absolutely wonderful theme. It is easy to remember and its beautiful. But for some reason I don't properly hear what happens in that metal part, so I'm not able to ascertain what is the musical idea or thing in the heavy metal part. There I feel lost, and I have no clue where I'm on my way. But every time you come back to the starting theme, the song feels solid and deep. Then I relax and start to enjoy the composition.
After that opening, I strongly believe that you have a solid idea within that heavy part also, but to my old ears it feels that it's buried under the distortion buzz of guitars and sizzle of hi-hats. The problem may be the nature of distortion in the sound of those guitars. There's no attack left. I'm not able to tell if the player hits the strings hard or touches them very gently. Also, I'm not able to properly hear the pitch and note changes. Those things are buried under that constant buzz and sizzle. Or maybe it's my brains that focus to them too much, and prevents me to listen the main thing. Maybe thats the reason I feel lost.
To solve that problem (which is probably problem only to me), I might try to turn down a bit the guitar mic level or the amps gain stage. Or is it some pedal that eats the attack from the notes out? Also, a low-pass filter might help. Either before or after the amp.
If the buzzing sustain is the thing in this genre, how about blending in another amp which has only a bit of distortion. So the guitar sound would consist of two different layers. The first amp would properly give the beginning of the note, and then as the first amp sound decays quiker the other amp would take over with sustained sound. Somethinglike that. Just a little bit of cleaner amp might be enough to tell the brains what it is, and with that information brains could probably hear better the note within the buzzing distortion.
===========
A Future in Noise: "Santa Clause"
I feel you have every element for the great song. And lots of nice small details. And great surprise moments. And I've always liked your sarcastic and philosophical humor that's present in spirit of your songs. I wish I had that skill to create those great absurd nuances.
But something is also wrong for I'm not able to properly remember that melody line that you just sung. I wish that the melody line would flow more smoothly and naturally. Probably it's the inherent rhythm in the lyrics that forces the melody line to be a bit clumsy. Im quite sure that if you were to play this as an instrumental and if you were able to forget the words for that moment, then, after a couple of circles the melody line would find it's natural flow. And when that happens, then try to create the words that would promptly follow the catchy melody line.
The Beatles went to extremes here. They were meticulous in getting the phonetically correct syllable at each critical point in the melody. I guess that for them the sound of the syllable was more important than the meaning of the chosen word. Perhaps this is partly why they are remembered more as composers than as lyricists.
===========
Paramnesia: "Occams Krzr"
A truly wonderful start. I liked it so much, that I found myself disappointed when the heavy metal part started. But it didn't last long. I soon realized that also this heavy part works, and extremely well. You serve up quite a collection of riffs. The strange rhythmic variations all feel natural, they flow smoothly and easily. If I tried to do something like that, I would stumble right away. The surprising chord progressions also feel natural. Apparently the key changes many times without the listener realizing it. In short: perfect mastery of the genre. (I'm saying this without knowing what the genre exactly is, but still I mean it.)
The only criticism that comes to mind is that this song feels more like a medley of great riffs than a composition. Maybe it is a kind of perfect "Show Reel" advertising your services: "let me make a convincing arrangement for your song."
===========
R0boooo: "Gotta Go but 1st"
After the opening synths this sounds to me like a nice jam session that I would love to be listening in some nice club. Or maybe the singer hasn't come yet and the band is rehearsing or doing a soundcheck. Interesting idea that slide duo: communicating slide guitars. The instrument selection of the band is also interesting and very atypical, but it works.
As there are no vocals on this one, so it's an instrumental. And quite often a melody is an essential part of an instrumental. But currently those slide guitar lines sound more like accompaniment and fills rather than melody lines. (Around 1:10 it's more melodic) I hope you could find some local emmylouharris to work with you. This would be an amazing song if she would sing some introspective lyrics with simple melody lines.
I like the fact that instruments' handling noises are not edited out. In some cases they can be an essential part of the sound. They add some sort of realism to this.
===========
PonySho: "Stringy"
Excellent, full of hooks, rhythmic changes, etc. Words are well written and the rhythm of words is essential part of rhythm section. And words are also very catchy and go very well with melody. I like the effect you create by repeating essential words. For some reason I'm quite sure that there's plenty of naughty double meanings in those words. Meanings hidden from others but evident to the target audience. But as an outsider I'm not able to pinpoint them.
It sounds and feels like simple song but there seems to be happening quite much under the hood. For example, I'm not able to determine the chord progression just by listening it, but still it feels natural. There seems to be key changes, but they flow so naturally that most of the listeners in the bar won't realise that they are listening quite sophisticated song. If you happen to have children, I'm sure you are able to make them eat healthy food while they are thinking that they are eating their favorite junk food from McDonalds.
So, I think this is truely a great song.
===========
mouse the singer: "Strings attached"
I feel like I'm listening to real and honest content, like a message from person to person. I forget to listen to the music when I end up listening to you and the message. So the music and arrangement seem to support the song very well.
I'm pretty sure this could be developed to new levels with sophisticated arrangement tricks, but on the other hand it doesn't need to, because it already does its job as it is.
===========
Ike H-mope: "Waiting in the Yard"
Atonal music is totally new area to me. This was a weird experience. I feel I'm in a foreign land. Everything feels and looks somewhat familiar but still I don't understand what's happening. I may understand a word here and there but I don't understand any sentence.
As I'm listening this and thinking what to say, it feels as if someone asks me to comment the poem they just read, but I don't even know the what the language was. People in the audience seem to have fun, and they have tears in their eyes. It clearly means lot to them. I just realize that there is something essential here, but I am unable to reach it. All I can say is: "One beer please. I'm sure I'll wake up soon." It's not a bad dream nor a good dream, its just a weird dream.
Sorry, that I couldn't find anything reasonable to say. Interesting experience not to be able to grasp anything, but still know that there's something. But anyway, I think I must spend some moments with atonal music just to see if an old fart like me could learn some new tricks.
===========
VCA-089: "Twilight Forest"
I love that bass sound. It's like from Twin Peaks. It ties the song together. And those drum sounds work very nicely together with that bass sound. You clearly master your stuff. Sound feels coherent all through. Theres nice key changes here and there, at least you lured me to think that. In the last moments I like how those rumbling drums vanish into a reverb. They feel to be present only in reverb only and no dry signal at all. I should try that someday.
Shortly, I have nothing to guide you. The trip was well done and went just the way it was planned. Greetings from Happy customer!
===========
EsteveCorbera: "Relaxa't I Viu El Moment"
Synths work very well, as it always does in your works. In that area your movements feel confident, and as a passenger I feel safe on the trip. But when it comes to guitar parts, it sounds as if you're thinking ”what should I do with this?” That uncertainty affects my listening moment. Think this way: just decide that it shall be "chord arpeggios", and then proudly play those chosen notes. Something that tells the listener: I played arpeggios for that's what I decided and wanted to play.
When that second guitar comes in (around 1:50), then the song comes together and as a listener I start to trust that there's somebody behind the steering wheel. From that point onwards it reminds me of Brian Enos ”Apollo”.
In the chord changes there's some kind of side-chained compressor as if muted kick track is pumping the synth volume down. Or is it muted bass that does the side-chaining there behind? Probably it's just basic artistic trick in synth music, but I'm just unaware of it.
VOTES
► Show Spoiler
1. (5 pts) VCA-089: "Twilight Forest"
2. (4 pts) PonySho: "Stringy"
3. (3 pts) Paramnesia: "Occams Krzr"
4. (2 pts) A Future in Noise: "Santa Clause"
5. (1 pts) mouse the singer: "Strings attached"